Pensum/l?ringskrav

Det tas forbehold om endringer

Det er kun litteratur market * som er pensum for Ger.syk. (4303)

B?ker

  • Polit D.F. og Beck C.T.  Nursing research: generating and assessing evidence for nursing practice. 10th ed. Philadelphia, Pa.: Wolters Kluwer/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2016.*
  • Thagaard T.  Systematikk og innlevelse: en innf?ring i kvalitativ metode. 4. utg. Bergen: Fagbokforlaget, 2013.*

Artikler

Artikler som belyser vitenskapsteoretiske retninger og andre overordnede metodiske perspektiver

  • Cudmore, H. og Sondemeyer, J. Through the looking glass: being a critical ethnographic researcher in a familiar nursing context. Nurse Researcher, 2007;14, 25-35*.
  • Jones ML. Application of systematic review methods to qualitative research: practical issues. Journal of Advanced Nursing.2004; 48(3):271-8*.
  • Butler A; Hall H; Copnell B. A Guide to Writing a Qualitative Systematic Review Protocol to Enhance Evidence-Based Practice in Nursing and Health Care.  Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing. 2016; 13(3):241-9   http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/wvn.12134/pdf
  • Finley L. ?Outing? the Researcher: The Provenance, Process, and Practice of Reflexivity. Qualitative Health Research 2002;12(4).*
  • Kuper A, Lingard L, Levinson W. Critically appraising qualitative research. BMJ 2008; 337. *
  • Curtis S, Gesler W, Smith G, og Wasjburn S. Approaches to sampling and case selection in qualitative research: examples in the geography of health. Social Science and Medicine,2000;50, 1001-1014.
  • Dowling, M. Hermeneutics: an exploration. Nurse Researcher, 2004;11, 30-39.
  • Earle, V. Phenomenology as research method or substantive metaphysics? An overview of phenomenologys uses in nursing. Nursing Philosophy, 2010;11, 286-296.*
  • Rolfe G. Validity, trustworthiness and rigour: Quality and the idea of qualitative research. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 2006;53, 304-310.
  • Risjord, M., Dunbar, S.B. og Moloney, M.F. A new foundation for methodological triangulation. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 2002; 34, 269-275.
  • Wimpenny, P. og Gass, J. Interviewing in phenomenology and grounded theory: is there a difference? Journal of Advanced Nursing, 2000; 31, 1485-1492.
  • Kevern, J. og Webb, C. Focus groups as a tool for critical social research in nurse education. Nurse Education Today, 2001;21, 323-333.

     

    Artikler som viser bruk av ulike metoder for datainnsamling

  • Fangen, K. Deltagende observasjon. Bergen: Fagbokforlaget, 2010
  • Kvale, S. og, Brinchman, S.  Interviews: Learning the craft of qualitative interviewing. London: Sage, 2009.
  • Patton MQ  Qualitative research and evaluation methods. London: Sage. Kap. 5, s230-46, 2002.
  • Foss C. Det visuelle i sykepleieforskningen. En lite utnyttet mulighet. Nordisk Sygeplejeforskning 2011;3(1).
  • Dowling M. From Husserl to van Manen. A review of different phenomenological approaches. International Journal of Nursing Studies 2007; 44:131–142.
  • Sandelowski, M.  What ever happened to qualitative description? Researech in Nursing and Health 2000;23(4), 334-340.
  • Sandelowski m., Barosso J. Reading qualitative studies International Journal of Qualitative Methods 2002; 1;(1).
  • Foss C., Ellefsen B. De utydelige overtramp? Etiske utfordringer ved kvalitative studier. V?rd i Norden 2004;7(24).
  • Hsiu-Fang H., Shannon S.E. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research 2005;15(9).
Publisert 27. mai 2019 19:24 - Sist endret 16. okt. 2019 10:49