Pensum SYKVIT4224 H?st 2019

Det tas forbehold om endringer

Pensumliste 4224 og 4303 H?st 2019

Det er kun litteratur market * som er pensum for Ger.syk. (4303)

 

B?ker

  • Polit D.F. og Beck C.T.  Nursing research: generating and assessing evidence for nursing practice. 10th ed. Philadelphia, Pa.: Wolters Kluwer/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2016.*
  • Thagaard T.  Systematikk og innlevelse: en innf?ring i kvalitativ metode. 4. utg. Bergen: Fagbokforlaget, 2013.*

     

     

Artikler

Artikler som belyser vitenskapsteoretiske retninger og andre overordnede metodiske perspektiver

  • Cudmore, H. og Sondemeyer, J. Through the looking glass: being a critical ethnographic researcher in a familiar nursing context. Nurse Researcher, 2007;14, 25-35*.
  • Jones ML. Application of systematic review methods to qualitative research: practical issues. Journal of Advanced Nursing.2004; 48(3):271-8*.
  • Butler A; Hall H; Copnell B. A Guide to Writing a Qualitative Systematic Review Protocol to Enhance Evidence-Based Practice in Nursing and Health Care.  Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing. 2016; 13(3):241-9   http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/wvn.12134/pdf
  • Finley L. ?Outing? the Researcher: The Provenance, Process, and Practice of Reflexivity. Qualitative Health Research 2002;12(4).*
  • Kuper A, Lingard L, Levinson W. Critically appraising qualitative research. BMJ 2008; 337. *
  • Curtis S, Gesler W, Smith G, og Wasjburn S. Approaches to sampling and case selection in qualitative research: examples in the geography of health. Social Science and Medicine,2000;50, 1001-1014.
  • Dowling, M. Hermeneutics: an exploration. Nurse Researcher, 2004;11, 30-39.
  • Earle, V. Phenomenology as research method or substantive metaphysics? An overview of phenomenologys uses in nursing. Nursing Philosophy, 2010;11, 286-296.*
  • Rolfe G. Validity, trustworthiness and rigour: Quality and the idea of qualitative research. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 2006;53, 304-310.
  • Risjord, M., Dunbar, S.B. og Moloney, M.F. A new foundation for methodological triangulation. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 2002; 34, 269-275.
  • Wimpenny, P. og Gass, J. Interviewing in phenomenology and grounded theory: is there a difference? Journal of Advanced Nursing, 2000; 31, 1485-1492.
  • Kevern, J. og Webb, C. Focus groups as a tool for critical social research in nurse education. Nurse Education Today, 2001;21, 323-333.

     

    Artikler som viser bruk av ulike metoder for datainnsamling

  • Bj?rk, I.T., T?ien, M. og S?rensen, A.L.  Exploring informal learning among hospital nurses. Journal of Workplace Learning, 2013;25, 426-440. (Observasjon og individuelle intervjuer)*
  • Foss, C, og Kirkevold, M. Unfolding the invisible of the visible: gendered constructions of patient participation. Nursing Inquiry, 2008; 15, 299-308. (Visuelle data)
  • Guillemin, M. og Heggen, K.  Rapport and respect: negotiating ethical relations between researcher and participant. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy,2009; 12, 291-299. (Etikk i intervjusituasjon)
  • Hauge, S. og Heggen, K.M. The nursing home as a home: a field study of residents’ daily life in the common living rooms. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 2008; 17, 460-467. (Observasjon)*
  • Juritsen, T.I, Engebretsen, E. og Heggen, K.M. (2013) Subject to empowerment: the constitution of power in an educational program for health professionals. Medical Health Care and Philosophy, 16, 443-455. (Dokumentanalyse - diskurs)
  • Knutsen IR, Terragni L, Foss C. Empowerment and Bariatric Surgery: Negotiations of Credibility and Control.   Qualitative Health Research 2013; 23(1): 66-77. ISSN 1049-7323.  (Diskursanalyse av praksis)
  • Sandelowski, M. Text-in-context: a method for extracting findings in mixed-methods mixed research synthesis studies. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 2013;69, 1428-1437. (Syntese av forskningsartikler)*
  • W?ien, H. og Bj?rk, I.T. (Intensive care pain treatment and sedation: Nurses’experiences of the conflict between clinical judgement and standardised care: An explorative study. Intensive and Critical Care Nursing, 2013;29, 128-136. (Fokus grupper)
  • Bragstad, LK., Kirkevold, M. & Foss, C. The indispensable intermediaries: a qualitative study of informal caregivers’ struggle to achieve influence at and after hospital discharge BMC Health Services Research 2014;13:331. (Innholdsanalyse). *

     

    Anbefalt litteratur

  • Fangen, K. Deltagende observasjon. Bergen: Fagbokforlaget, 2010
  • Kvale, S. og, Brinchman, S.  Interviews: Learning the craft of qualitative interviewing. London: Sage, 2009.
  • Patton MQ  Qualitative research and evaluation methods. London: Sage. Kap. 5, s230-46, 2002.
  • Foss C. Det visuelle i sykepleieforskningen. En lite utnyttet mulighet. Nordisk Sygeplejeforskning 2011;3(1).
  • Dowling M. From Husserl to van Manen. A review of different phenomenological approaches. International Journal of Nursing Studies 2007; 44:131–142.
  • Sandelowski, M.  What ever happened to qualitative description? Researech in Nursing and Health 2000;23(4), 334-340.
  • Sandelowski m., Barosso J. Reading qualitative studies International Journal of Qualitative Methods 2002; 1;(1).
  • Foss C., Ellefsen B. De utydelige overtramp? Etiske utfordringer ved kvalitative studier. V?rd i Norden 2004;7(24).
  • Hsiu-Fang H., Shannon S.E. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research 2005;15(9).
Publisert 27. mai 2019 19:29 - Sist endret 27. mai 2019 19:29